63-56-405 Preference for resident contractors.
(1) As used in this section, "resident contractor" means a person,
partnership, corporation, or other business entity that:
(a) either has its principal place of business in Utah or that employs workers
who are residents of this state when available; and
(b) was transacting business on the date when bids for the public contract
were first solicited.
(2) (a) When awarding contracts for construction, a public procurement unit
shall grant a resident contractor a reciprocal preference as against a nonresident
contractor from any state that gives or requires a preference to contractors
from that state.
(b) The amount of the reciprocal preference shall be equal to the amount of
the preference applied by the state of the nonresident contractor.
(3) (a) The bidder shall certify on the bid that he qualifies as a resident
contractor.
(b) The reciprocal preference is waived if that certification does not appear
on the bid.
(4) (a) If the contractor submitting the lowest responsive and responsible
bid is not a resident contractor and has his principal place of business in
any state that gives or requires a preference to contractors from that state,
and if a resident contractor has also submitted a responsive and responsible
bid, and, with the benefit of the reciprocal preference, the resident contractor's
bid is equal to or less than the original lowest bid, the procurement officer
shall:
(i) give notice to the resident contractor that he qualifies as a preferred
resident contractor; and
(ii) issue the contract to the resident contractor if, within 72 hours after
notification to him that he is a preferred resident contractor, he agrees,
in writing, to meet the low bid.
(b) The procurement officer shall include the exact price submitted by the
lowest bidder in the notice he submits to the preferred resident contractor.
(c) The procurement officer may not enter into a contract with any other bidder
for the construction until 72 hours have elapsed after notification to the
preferred resident contractor.
(5) (a) If there is more than one preferred resident contractor, the procurement
officer shall award the contract to the willing preferred resident contractor
who was the lowest preferred resident contractor originally.
(b) If there were two or more equally low preferred resident contractors, the
procurement officer shall comply with the rules adopted by the Procurement
Policy Board to determine which bidder should be awarded the contract.
(6) The provisions of this section do not apply if application of this section
might jeopardize the receipt of federal funds.
63-56-426. Tie bids -- Preference for providers of state products -- Resolution
of tie bids -- Record of tie bids.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) (i) "Commodity" means a good, product, material, or item, including
an agricultural, manufacturing, or mining product;
(ii) "Commodity" does not include:
(A) a service; or
(B) construction materials or services.
(b) "Provider of state products" means a bidder offering goods, supplies,
products, materials, or items that are produced, manufactured, mined, or grown
in the state.
(c) "Tie bid" means a low responsive bid from a responsive bidder
that is identical in price to a responsive bid from another responsive bidder.
(2) In the event of a tie bid for the provision of a commodity where only one
of the bidders having the low responsive bid is a provider of state products,
a public procurement unit shall award the contract to the provider of state
products if:
(a) the quality of the commodity offered by the provider of state products
is equal to or greater than the quality of the commodity offered by the other
tied bidders;
(b) the commodity offered by the provider of state products is suitable for
the use required by the public procurement unit; and
(c) the provider of state products is able to produce the commodity in sufficient
quantity.
(3) Unless Subsection (2) applies, a public procurement unit shall make an
award on a tie bid by using one of the following procedures, which shall be
selected in the sole discretion of the procurement officer:
(a) where a tie bid includes the cost of delivery, awarding the contract to
the bidder closest to the point of delivery;
(b) awarding the contract to the identical bidder who received the previous
award, and continue to award succeeding contracts to the same bidder so long
as all low bids are tie bids;
(c) awarding the contract to the bidder with the earliest delivery date;
(d) if the price of the tie bid is considered excessive or the bids are unsatisfactory
for another reason, rejecting all bids and negotiating a more favorable contact
on the open market; or
(e) if the procurement officer determines in writing that no method under this
Subsection (3) will equitably resolve the tie bid, awarding the contract by
drawing lots.
(4) Awards of tie bids shall not be made by:
(a) dividing business among tied bidders; or
(b) drawing lots, except as provided in Subsection (3)(e).
(5) (a) A state public procurement unit shall retain a record of each invitation
for bids on which a tie bid is received, that shall include the following information:
(i) the invitation for bids;
(ii) the supply, service, or construction item requested by the invitation
for bids;
(iii) all the bidders and the prices submitted;
(iv) the procedure used to resolve the tie bid; and
(v) the results of the procedure used to resolve the tie bid, including the
name of the bidder awarded the contract.
(b) A copy of the record maintained under Subsection (5)(a) shall be provided
to the attorney general for all contracts having a tie bid in excess of $50,000.
STATES WITH PREFERENCE LAWS
2006
STATE Amount of Preference
Alaska 5%* Alaska Bidders, Alaska Products 5-7%A summary of these state's laws is in the State Purchasing director's office.
STATES WITH RECIPROCAL PREFERENCE LAWS
Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana,
Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska,
New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia,
Wisconsin